University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA; Independent Researcher, Triolet, Mauritius; Christus St. Michael Hospital, Texarkana, Texas, USA
aDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (Renuka Verma); bIndependent Researcher, Triolet, Mauritius (Kamleshun Ramphul); cDepartment of Internal Medicine, Christus St. Michael Hospital, Texarkana Texas, USA (Hemamalini Sakthivel)
Background Severe sepsis with septic shock (SSWSS) is a potential and severe complication that can arise among patients hospitalized for acute biliary pancreatitis.
Methods We queried the 2018-2021 National Inpatient Sample for adults with a primary diagnosis code of acute biliary pancreatitis without necrosis or infection. Baseline characteristics of the patients were studied and multivariate regression models were used to appraise the roles of different factors for events of SSWSS.
Results We evaluated 136,140 adults who had acute biliary pancreatitis without necrosis or infection on admission; their median age was 57.0 years, and the majority were female (60.6%). Of these, 435 patients developed SSWSS. Higher odds were seen in cases with coexisting chronic kidney disease (P<0.001), liver cirrhosis (P<0.001), and human immunodeficiency virus infection (P<0.001). Races other than White/Black/Hispanics had higher odds (P<0.001) than Whites. Females were less likely to report SSWSS (P<0.001) than males. Moreover, patients from the 26th-50th median household quartiles had lower odds of SSWSS than those in the 0-25th quartiles. Medium (P<0.001) and large (P<0.001) hospitals reported more cases than small hospitals. Admissions in the southern areas of the United States also exhibited higher odds (P=0.026), than Northeast regions. Lower odds were noted in smokers (P<0.001) and cases with dyslipidemia (P=0.048). SSWSS led to higher mortality rates (65.5% vs. 0.4%).
Conclusions In our nationwide analysis, we found that episodes of SSWSS among patients with acute biliary pancreatitis were influenced by several factors. SSWSS patients also had higher mortality.
Keywords Acute biliary pancreatitis, severe sepsis, critical care, United States of America
Ann Gastroenterol 2025; 38 (3): 337-344
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a major healthcare burden in the USA, accounting for over 200,000 admissions and hospital visits each year [1] with a rising trend [2,3]. Obstruction due to gallstone (acute biliary pancreatitis, ABP) is the most common cause of AP, representing 38% of all cases, while alcohol is a close second with 36% [4-6]. Other less common pathologies can involve medications, autoimmune diseases, recent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/abdominal surgery, trauma, and infections, among others [7].
Although most patients with ABP experience an event-free recovery, there is a risk of local and systemic complications [8]. One such complication involves severe sepsis with septic shock (SSWSS), which has high mortality and risk of morbidity. In fact, in rare cases, even ABP patients with no necrosis or infection on admission can develop SSWSS. Acute pancreatitis can increase the expression of various proinflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6, that can cause damage to the intestinal mucosal membranes. The impaired intestinal barrier allows bacterial spread, which plays an important role in the development of pancreatic infection, necrosis, and eventual sepsis [9-12]. Moreover, the leakage of pancreatic enzymes into the pancreatic and neighboring tissues can trigger a direct insult that may complicate with obstruction, inflammation and necrosis, and become a nidus of infection [13]. However, at present, there is a lack of recent data concerning the presence of ABP and complications such as SSWSS. Therefore, we designed a designed a retrospective analysis that would help identify the incidence of SSWSS among ABP cases initially admitted with no necrosis or infections, and the factors that led to SSWSS. We also aimed to estimate the mortality risk associated with SSWSS in ABP patients.
We performed a retrospective analysis of hospital records from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). The NIS contains billing data from hospitals across the USA and is produced annually as part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). The publicly-accessible database is a 20% stratified sample, which can be used to estimate over 98% of the national hospitalization records, via proper adjustments, as per HCUP’s recommendations [14].
The NIS contains no identifying patient information, only patient data such as age, sex, race and primary payer form, as well as hospital demographics. Users can further input additional diagnoses and procedures using International Classification of Diseases version 10 - Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) and Procedural (ICD-10-PR) codes [14,15].
For our study, we focused on patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of biliary acute pancreatitis without necrosis or infection, using the ICD-10 code K85.10. Data between 2018 and 2021 were analyzed, restricted to patients aged 18 years and over. Patients with COVID-19 were also excluded [16]. To avoid duplication of data, we did not include cases that were transferred in or out. Finally, cases with missing data for our variables of interest were also removed from our analysis. Our study conformed with the reporting standards of the STROBE guidelines [17].
First, we evaluated the baseline patient variables including sex, race, age, weekend (vs. weekday) admission, median household income quartiles, and primary payer forms. The presence of multiple comorbidities was also assessed: hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, liver cirrhosis, smoking, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, alcohol abuse, obesity, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), cachexia, drug abuse, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Hospital demographics, such as rural vs. urban (teaching vs. non-teaching), size (no. of beds) and region, were also evaluated.
The main outcome of the study involved the occurrence of SSWSS (ICD-10 code R65.21). Other outcomes of interest compared the median ages, length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges between patients with and without SSWSS.
We performed our statistical analyses using STATA version 18.0 and SPSS version 29.0. Adhering to HCUP’s guidelines, our study used the variable “DISCWT” to produce a national estimate. Variables ≤10 were not reported to protect the patients’ identity. To estimate the impact of variables that contributed to SSWSS events, a multivariate logistic regression model was constructed, containing variables found to have significance (P<0.05) on univariate screening, or were deemed relevant (race, income quartile, hospital region, size, and insurance type). The differences in ages, LOS, and hospital charges were compared via Mann-Whitney U tests, and reported as median value and interquartile range. Statistical significance was maintained at P<0.05 for our study.
As our study relied solely on the NIS, which is released with no patient identifiers, it was exempt from ethics board approval or institutional Review Board review. This complies with the guidelines issued by HCUP on the use of the NIS. Authors handling the raw data from HCUP took the mandated training and signed their user agreement.
We evaluated a total of 136,140 adults who were hospitalized for biliary acute pancreatitis without necrosis or infection between 2018 and 2021 (Fig. 1). The median age was 57.00 years, with an interquartile range of 41.00-71.00. Most patients were females (60.6% vs. 39.4% males), who were also younger (females: median 55.00 years, IQR 36.00-69.00, vs. males: median 61.00 years, IQR 47.00-72.00). Most patients (62.0%) were racially White, followed by Hispanics (20.0%), and Blacks (10.4%). Medicare covered 36.4% of cases, while private insurances and Medicaid covered 35.3% and 18.0%, respectively.
Figure 1 Selection of patients from the NIS
NIS, National Inpatient Sample; SSWS, severe sepsis with septic shock
Most patients (27.7%) were from the lower (0-25th) median household income quartiles. We further found that 28.1% of all hospitalizations took place during the weekend. The majority of patients were treated in hospitals classified as large (45.3%), urban teaching centers (70.0%), and in southern regions of the USA (39.4%).
Most commonly observed comorbidities included hypertension (39.7%), dyslipidemia (33.6%), smoking (31.7%), obesity (30.1%) and diabetes (22.5%), with fewer cases exhibiting chronic kidney disease (9.0%), peripheral vascular disease (2.1%), liver cirrhosis (5.3%), alcohol abuse (5.2%), HIV (0.4%), cachexia (0.2%), drug abuse (3.1%), or COPD (6.7%) (Table 1).
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients admitted with acute biliary pancreatitis
There were 435 cases that developed SSWSS (320 cases per 100,000 ABP admissions); these patients were older: median age 70.00 years (IQR 60.00-78.00) vs. median 57.00 years, (IQR 41.00-71.00) in patients without SSWSS.
Patient demographics and comorbidities in our univariable analyses that reported a P-value less than 0.05 included sex (odds ratio [OR] 0.377, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.310-0.459, P<0.001), hypertension (OR 0.577, 95%CI 0.467-0.712; P<0.001), dyslipidemia (OR 1.532, 95%CI 1.267-1.852; P<0.001), smoking (OR 0.485, 95%CI 0.381-0.618; P<0.001), diabetes (OR 2.114, 95%CI 1.741-2.567; P<0.001), liver cirrhosis (OR 10.539, 95%CI 8.660-12.825; P<0.001), obesity (OR 0.786, 95%CI 0.633-0.975; P=0.029), HIV status (OR 12.651, 95%CI 8.011-19.979; P<0.001), COPD (OR 1.813, 95%CI 1.349-2.436; P<0.001) (Table 2).
Table 2 Univariate regression models and the odds ratios of severe sepsis with septic shock among adults with acute biliary pancreatitis
Following the previously described multivariate regression model, factors associated with higher odds of SSWSS included chronic kidney disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.766, 95%CI 3.685-6.163, P<0.001), liver cirrhosis (aOR 7.942, 95%CI 6.477-9.739, P<0.001) and HIV (aOR 15.308, 95%CI 8.976-26.107, P<0.001). Moreover, patients admitted to medium-sized (aOR 1.877, 95%CI 1.383-2.549, P<0.001) or large hospitals (aOR 2.095, 95%CI 1.568-2.799, P<0.001) were more likely to report SSWSS than those in small hospitals. While no racial differences were seen for Blacks (aOR 0.755, 95%CI 0.526-1.085, P=0.128) and Hispanics (aOR 0.941, 95%CI 0.700-1.264, P=0.684) as compared to Whites, those classified as non-White/Black/Hispanic (aOR 2.128, 95%CI 1.600-2.830, P<0.001) had higher odds of SSWSS. Sex-based differences were also noted, with lower odds among females (aOR 0.456, 95%CI 0.372-0.559, P<0.001). Finally, we also saw socioeconomic disparities, with lower odds among those in the 26th-50th percentile (aOR 0.578, 95%CI 0.432-0.775, P<0.001) (vs. 0-25th), while patients in the 51st-75th (aOR 0.761, 95%CI 0.580-1.000, P=0.050) and 76th-100th (aOR 0.930, 95%CI 0.708-1.222, P=0.601) percentiles were all comparable (Table 3).
Table 3 Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of severe sepsis with septic shock among adults with acute biliary pancreatitis
Patients with dyslipidemia (aOR 0.808, 95%CI 0.671-1.120, P=0.048) and smoking (aOR 0.374, 95%CI 0.290-0.483, P<0.001) recorded lower odds of SSWSS. No statistically significant differences were seen for other variables, including hypertension (aOR 0.867, 95%CI 0.671-1.120, P=0.274), diabetes (aOR 1.127, 95%CI 0.910-13.96, P=0.272), obesity (aOR 1.134, 95%CI 0.900-1.428, P=0.286), COPD (aOR 1.202, 95%CI 0.878-1.647, P=0.251) and primary payer insurance type (Table 3). SSWSS events were associated with a longer LOS (median 9.00 days, IQR 5.00-19.00 vs. 4.00, IQR 2.00-5.00; P<0.001) and higher hospital charges (median $178,926 IQR $90,054-318,288 vs. median $47,147, IQR $28,806-73,493; P<0.001). An estimated 65.5% of patients with SSWSS died (vs. 0.4% in the non-SSWSS cohort).
To our knowledge, our study is the first extended, national analysis to evaluate the baseline characteristics of patients with biliary acute pancreatitis without necrosis or infection, as well as the factors that influence the occurrence of SSWSS. In total, we evaluated 136,140 adult cases and found that a higher proportion were females, a finding that is comparable with the higher odds of gallstones in women as compared to men, as previously reported [18,19]. We also found that majority of the patients were White, which reflects the US census distribution. In addition, the second most involved racial group were Hispanics, with almost twice the percentage of Blacks. In the core NIS file of all hospitalizations between 2018-2021, Hispanics usually cover 12-13% of sample sizes, while Blacks cover 15-16%. The higher percentage of Hispanic patients with acute biliary pancreatitis compared to Blacks correlates with a study by Figueiredo et al, where Hispanics in the USA were linked with higher odds of reporting gall bladder-related disease; this could be connected to genetic as well as environmental factors, including diet [20].
Our study further found that 27.7% of cases were from people with the lowest household income quartile in the United States. Li et al, in their analysis, found that this group also represented the highest proportion of patients admitted for symptomatic cholelithiasis (32.5%) and cholecystitis (29.1%) [21]. It is vital to understand whether the socioeconomic disparities impacted their access to care and follow up, which in turn led to complications, including acute biliary pancreatitis. Our study also showed similar geographic distributions, with more cases being treated in the southern regions of the USA [21] and in urban hospitals [22], as with other gallbladder and biliary diseases.
A significant portion of patients were also obese (30.1%), which is a major risk factor for gallbladder and biliary complications [23]. We also found a higher prevalence of smoking, which can slow down gallbladder emptying, thus predisposing to gallstone formation [24] and eventual biliary pancreatitis. While the NIS does not include precise coding details for medications, 39.7% of patients had a history of hypertension and 33.6% of them had dyslipidemia. The direct impact of cholesterol and the influence of lipid-lowering medications, such as fibrates, and antihypertensive medications, such as thiazides, on the development of gallstones could predispose such patients to biliary pancreatitis [25-27]. A more thorough comparison, using retrospective records from different centers, could help clarify such issues.
In the second part of our analysis, we found that, among the 136,140 cases who were admitted with no necrosis and infection, there were 435 patients (320 cases per 100,000) who developed SSWSS, potentially attributable to a variety of factors. Higher odds were seen with age, as SSWSS patients were older. Such a finding might be related to the waning immune response seen with aging, as well as the potential presence of multiple comorbidities and age-related changes in pathophysiology [28-30]. In addition, although 60.6% of all admitted patients were female, SSWSS was more likely to involve males than females—possibly because the male patients in our study were older than the female patients.
While events of SSWSS were comparable between Whites, Blacks and Hispanics, other races exhibited higher odds of such events. We also found that those in the 26th-50th income quartile had lower odds of SSWSS than those in the lower quartile, with no differences between the top two quartiles. To reduce such disparities, studies at various community levels should be encouraged, to help openly address any issues these patients had in seeking medical care, as well as at hospital level, to identify other factors that contributed to such racial and socioeconomic discrepancies.
Our study further identified that patients in large centers, as compared to small centers, were more prone to experience SSWSS, as were patients in Southern as compared to Northeastern regions. While the center size differences might be linked with the more complex cases being treated, underdiagnosis and underreporting of SSWSS in small centers cannot be ruled out. A center-based retrospective analysis of cases should be encouraged, which could help map the distribution of centers and elucidate any link with a hospital’s region.
In addition, we also noted that some factors, such as chronic kidney disease, liver cirrhosis and HIV, predisposed patients to SSWSS. The liver is a key organ involved in a balanced immune response to trauma and exposure to potential infectious agents; it is therefore vital for physicians to properly assess patients’ liver function and, if necessary, quantify them as high-risk for complications [31]. Similarly, patients with impaired kidney function will have a buildup of toxic materials that can impair healing [32], impact appetite [33] and weaken their immune system [34]. Patients with HIV have a blunted immune system, with a potentially lower T-cell count. The NIS data, however, did not allow us to identify and adjust for T-cell levels or any ongoing antiretroviral therapy. Nevertheless, our finding of a high adjusted odds ratio raises serious concerns about these patients’ outcomes. It is important to understand the key reasons that caused such risks, other than their immune system, and promote adequate changes. We noted that patients who were smokers or had dyslipidemia had lower odds of reporting SSWSS. Prior studies have confirmed that smokers have a downregulated immune response [35-37]. Since part of the pathophysiology of sepsis in acute pancreatitis relies on the immune response and damage caused by cytokines [12], smokers may be experiencing a suppressed immune reaction, which could explain the lower odds seen in our study. Patients with dyslipidemia may be on drugs such as statins. The ASEPSIS trial by Rachoin et al found that statins impaired the progression of sepsis [38]. As the NIS does not include data for the current drugs taken by patients, we were unable to take such potential confounders into account. As the pathophysiology of sepsis in pancreatitis involves a complex interplay of multiple factors, it is imperative to advocate for further research. Such future studies, carried out at multiple centers, should also include a range of medications that might impact the variables of our study.
Finally, we confirmed that SSWSS was a major factor that contributed to death among patients admitted with acute biliary pancreatitis, with a higher hospital charge and a longer stay. To help reduce the burden of healthcare, it is important that physicians are able to identify patients who are at risk for SSWSS. Changes in protocols should be implemented, including a more thorough check of vitals and appropriate identification of the early signs of sepsis.
Our evaluation of data from the biggest inpatient database provided very important findings. However, there were several limitations that need to be addressed. First, the database relies on hospital codes for various procedures and conditions. Mistakes in coding and differences in coding for SSWSS or similar comorbidities might have influenced our results. Moreover, our data did not contain information on the severity at time of admission, the time from symptom to admission, the medications being used, and patients’ laboratory values. With such limitations, we were unable to categorize the ABP patients based on severity, or to adopt various scoring systems, such as the Ranson criteria, APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II), BISAP (Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis), or Glasgow scores. A retrospective review of hospital cases in future studies can overcome such limitations and help consolidate our results.
In addition to several retrospective studies, it is important to promote future research to improve our understanding of the various pathways that are involved in the pathogenesis of sepsis in ABP patients. Moreover, additional studies targeting the management of ABP with SSWSS, and factors impacting the patients’ short and long-term outcomes, mortality and healthcare burden, should also be considered.
To conclude, our study confirmed that, while SSWSS is a rare occurrence among patients with acute biliary pancreatitis with no necrosis or infection on admission, it is associated with a range of factors, including sex, race, age, hospital demographics and comorbidities. Moreover, SSWSS is a major predictor of mortality among such patients, and there is an urgent need to conduct more studies so that other factors can be identified and disparities remedied.
What is already known:
More than 200,000 cases of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations are encountered annually
Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) due to gallstones is the leading cause of pancreatitis, followed by alcohol
Severe sepsis can develop in some cases of acute biliary pancreatitis, with a high mortality rate
What the new findings are:
The incidence of severe sepsis with septic shock was 320 cases per 100,000 ABP admissions
Higher odds of septic shock were seen in older patients, males, races other than White/Black/Hispanic, those in the lowest income quartiles, in medium and large hospitals, in admissions within the southern region, among patients with chronic kidney disease, liver cirrhosis or human immunodeficiency virus infection
The overall mortality rate in patients with septic shock was 65.5%
The authors would like to acknowledge the HCUP, AHRQ, and partners across the country who helped create the NIS and would like to thank them for allowing us access to use it. Additional details about the NIS and their partners can be found at:
1. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, et al. Burden of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 2015;149:1731-1741.
2. Iannuzzi JP, King JA, Leong JH, et al. Global incidence of acute pancreatitis is increasing over time:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2022;162:122-134.
3. Garg SK, Sarvepalli S, Campbell JP, et al. Incidence, admission rates, and predictors, and economic burden of adult emergency visits for acute pancreatitis:data from the National Emergency Department Sample, 2006 2012. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019;53:220-225.
4. Lankisch PG, Assmus C, Lehnick D, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB. Acute pancreatitis:does gender matter?Dig Dis Sci 2001;46:2470-2474.
5. Spanier BW, Dijkgraaf MG, Bruno MJ. Epidemiology, aetiology and outcome of acute and chronic pancreatitis:an update. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008;22:45-63.
6. Wang GJ, Gao CF, Wei D, Wang C, Ding SQ. Acute pancreatitis:etiology and common pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:1427-1430.
7. Gapp J, Tariq A, Chandra S. Acute pancreatitis. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL):StatPearls Publishing Copyright ©2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.;2024.
8. Hazem ZM. Acute biliary pancreatitis:diagnosis and treatment. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2009;15:147-155.
9. Beger HG, Rau B, Isenmann R, Schwarz M, Gansauge F, Poch B. Antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2005;5:10-19.
10. Dervenis C, Smailis D, Hatzitheoklitos E. Bacterial translocation and its prevention in acute pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003;10:415-418.
11. Xiao S, Jing S, Jiakui S, et al. Butyrate ameliorates intestinal epithelial barrier injury via enhancing Foxp3+regulatory T-cell function in severe acute pancreatitis model. Turk J Gastroenterol 2022;33:710-719.
12. Zhang C, Li G, Lu T, et al. The interaction of microbiome and pancreas in acute pancreatitis. Biomolecules 2023;14:59.
13. Rawla P, Bandaru SS, Vellipuram AR. Review of infectious etiology of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology Res 2017;10:153-158.
14. HCUP National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. 2024. Available from:https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp [Accessed 9 April 2025].
15. Data Organizations Participating in HCUP. 2024. Available from:https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/partners.jsp [Accessed 9 April 2025].
16. Ramphul K, Dhaliwal JS, Sombans S, et al. Trends in admissions for COVID-19 in the United States between April 2020 and December 2021 and cardiovascular events. Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis 2024;9:60-65.
17. Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP;STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement:guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007;335:806-808.
18. Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR. Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 1999;117:632-639.
19. Wang X, Yu W, Jiang G, et al. Global epidemiology of gallstones in the 21st century:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024;22:1586-1595.
20. Figueiredo JC, Haiman C, Porcel J, et al. Sex and ethnic/racial-specific risk factors for gallbladder disease. BMC Gastroenterol 2017;17:153.
21. Li S, Guizzetti L, Ma C, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of symptomatic cholelithiasis and cholecystitis in the USA:trends and urban-rural variations. J Gastrointest Surg 2023;27:932-944.
22. Li S, Guizzetti L, Ma C, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of choledocholithiasis and cholangitis in the United States:trends and urban-rural variations. BMC Gastroenterol 2023;23:254.
23. Khatua B, El-Kurdi B, Singh VP. Obesity and pancreatitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2017;33:374-382.
24. Degirmenci B, Albayrak R, Haktanir A, Acar M, Yucel A. Acute effect of smoking on gallbladder emptying and refilling in chronic smokers and nonsmokers:a sonographic study. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:5540-5543.
25. Leitzmann MF, Tsai CJ, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Giovannucci E. Thiazide diuretics and the risk of gallbladder disease requiring surgery in women. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:567-573.
26. Wang J, Shen S, Wang B, et al. Serum lipid levels are the risk factors of gallbladder stones:a population-based study in China. Lipids Health Dis 2020;19:50.
27. Zhang Y, Sun L, Wang X, Chen Z. The association between hypertension and the risk of gallstone disease:a cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol 2022;22:138.
28. Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Aging of the immune system. Mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016;13(Suppl 5):S422-S428.
29. Yu B, Li N, Li J, et al. The clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis in gerontal patients:a retrospective study. Clin Interv Aging 2020;15:1541-1553.
30. Nasa P, Juneja D, Singh O. Severe sepsis and septic shock in the elderly:an overview. World J Crit Care Med 2012;1:23-30.
31. Kubes P, Jenne C. Immune responses in the liver. Annu Rev Immunol 2018;36:247-277.
32. Maroz N, Simman R. Wound healing in patients with impaired kidney function. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec 2013;5:2-7.
33. Sung CC, Liao MT, Chao CT. Independent determinants of appetite impairment among patients with stage 3 or higher chronic kidney disease:a prospective study. Nutrients 2021;13:2863.
34. Syed-Ahmed M, Narayanan M. Immune dysfunction and risk of infection in chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2019;26:8-15.
35. Qiu F, Liang CL, Liu H, et al. Impacts of cigarette smoking on immune responsiveness:up and down or upside down?Oncotarget 2017;8:268-284.
36. Saint-AndréV, Charbit B, Biton A, et al;Milieu Intérieur Consortium. Smoking changes adaptive immunity with persistent effects. Nature 2024;626:827-835.
37. Kalra R, Singh SP, Savage SM, Finch GL, Sopori ML. Effects of cigarette smoke on immune response:chronic exposure to cigarette smoke impairs antigen-mediated signaling in T cells and depletes IP3-sensitive Ca(2+) stores. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000;293:166-171.
38. Rachoin JS, Cerceo E, Dellinger RP. A new role for statins in sepsis. Crit Care 2013;17:105.